Synonyms / Other Terms Used
Accessible, Accessible Facility, Accessible Route, Barrier-free Access, Barrier-free Mobility, Disabled, Handicapped, Reduced Mobility, Wheelchair Accessible, Wheelchair Facility, Wheelchair User, Wheelchair, Wheelchairs
Category
General Access, Public Facilities
Message / Function
To indicate routes and facilities with full accessibility (including the location of an accessible toilet)
Source | Description | |
---|---|---|
X'67 | Side view of chair, circle superimposed indicating wheel | |
Koefoed | Side view of wheelchair with arm- and footrest, but without caster wheels | |
ISA 1969 | Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
ISO 7000 | Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
Eco-Mo Foundation |
Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
Tern | Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
MUTCD | Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
NÖ Familienpass | Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
Transport for London |
Side view of sitting stick figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
DB | Side view of sitting human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
UIC 413 | Side view of sitting human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
ISO 7001 | Side view of sitting human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
BS 8501:2002 | Side view of human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
ineltec | Side view of sitting human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
U.S. National Park Service |
Side view of human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
HSSS | Side view of human figure with arm on armrest, arc below as wheelchair | |
ÖNORM A 3011 | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Zurich Airport | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
O'72 | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Avanti PUM | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Lanit | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
adlerschmidt | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Wiener Linien | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest, horizontal line at bottom | |
DTM Berlin | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Pacific Bell | Side view of human figure in wheelchair with arm on armrest | |
Expo '70 | Side view of human figure in wheelchair | |
Avanti LID | Side view of human figure in wheelchair | |
Mater Dei | Side view of human figure in outline, in wheelchair | |
EJP | Side view of human figure in wheelchair | |
Swiss Post | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, hand on wheel | |
MGBB | Side view of stick figure in wheelchair, hand on wheel | |
OS Berlin | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, hand on wheel | |
ÖBB 2007 | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Transantiago | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Picto'grafics | Side view of stick figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
IKEA | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
IUAV | Side view of human figure in wheelchair | |
Kolokolova | Side view of human figure in wheelchair | |
Integral | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, hand on wheel | |
Guemil | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
adlerschmidt | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Handbuch wien.gv.at | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Murphy | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Daniel Choi Design | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
KSA | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
Ota S | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, arm position indicating activity | |
AIP | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, posture indicating fast movement | |
Microsoft | Side view of human figure in wheelchair in outline, posture indicating fast movement | |
Marshalls | Side view of human figure in wheelchair, two arcs indicating movement | |
Career Moves | Side view of active human figure in wheelchair, arms and shoulder as swung dash |
Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.
Discussion
A view at the table above implies something like an agreement on how to indicate routes and facilities with full accessibility, as almost all variants present a side view of human figure on a wheel chair. Differences mostly are found just in some fine details, but some vary in significant aspects:
At the time of the creation of the International Symbol of Accessibility (ISA) several organizations had their individual concepts to indicate accessible facilities. Due to excellent promotion and the inclusion of this symbol into ISO 7000 it was used worldwide and became widely accepted. While most of the older pictograms show a rather static and passive wheelchair user, later designs reflect societal changes also mirrored in language by using the word accessible instead of handicapped and show a move towards displaying active and independent wheelchair users by changing arm position and posture. In this effort to change how people with disabilities are seen, some go even farther and try to signal fast movement like in the variants shown at the bottom of the table. But such symbols ignore the fact that people with more serious disabilities cannot move dynamically and have to rely on some kind of assistance. More information on this discussion can be found for example in the Fact Sheet about the International Symbol of Accessibility, Ben-Moshe et.al. (2007) 'Sign of our times? Revis(it)ing the International Symbol of Access, the website of the The Accessible Icon Project, and many others.
Research data on comprehensibility of symbols concerning accessibility is rather limited in our database:
In a Japanese study to propose domestically unified graphical symbols based on scientific methods, the pictogram variant labeled as Eco-Mo Foundation reached a score of 94.7 in a Comprehension Test according to ISO 9186 FDIS 1999, an excellent value (Eco-Mo Foundation, 2001). In an earlier Comprehension Test (Brugger, 1979), 92 % of the answers concerning the variant from the Austrian standard ÖNORM A 3011 could be classified as correct when applying lenient scoring. Answers at that time were quite heterogeneous, like for example Wheelchair (17 %), Wheelchair User (11 %), Handicapped (34 %), Disabled (10 %), or Route for Disabled (8 %). And in a project from Brazil examining a variant similar to the official ISA symbol, only 22.6 % of the responses were classified as correct regarding the definition: Access for Physical Impaired (Fiori, 2008). In case of this referent strictness of response categorization and scoring is essential for comprehensibility results. We recommend lenient scoring, as respondents often do not provide detailed answers.
Further test data is mostly on specific applications of accessibility symbols or on perception of disability and other related aspects.
Recommendations
At the moment we recommend using a pictogram similar to ISO 7001 public information symbol PI AC 001, formerly PI PF 006, to indicate routes and facilities with full accessibility, including the location of an accessible toilet.
In the long term we suggest development of a pictogram displaying a somewhat more active and independent wheelchair user that could also represent a person with serious disabilities as for example in the variants from Transantiago and the Guemil Project, and include these in a testing program also covering the ISA and ISO 7001 variants as well as the Accessible Icon Project version. Besides aspects concerning the perception of disability such a program should also include a Comprehension Test providing some context information to get realistic results. This method also helps to identify possible misinterpretations and delivers hints to improve designs.
On the other hand quite a number of experts (e.g. comments in Hora, 2017, but also from personal communication) recommend staying with the International Symbol of Accessibility for several reasons. They even reject adaptions made for the ISO 7001 guideline example and advocate using the International Symbol of Accessibility also in the future.
Tests of pictograms of referent Accessible, Full Accessibility
Barstow, B.A., Vice, J., Bowman, S., et al. (2019): Examining perceptions of existing and newly created accessibility symbols. Disability and Health Journal 2019, 12(2): 180-186.
Brugger, Ch. (1979): Abschlußbericht über den Erkennungstest. Report to the Austrian Standards Institute (ON) dated 09/79, Vienna.
Eco-Mo Foundation (2001): Test data of public information symbols in Japan - Procedure for the testing of public information symbols by the Study Committee. ISO: ISO/TC 145/SC 1 N 329.
Fiori, S.R. (2008): Mapas para o turismo e a interatividade - proposta teórica e prática. Tese de Doutorado - Depto. de Geografia, FFLCH-USP.
Jensen, C. (2015): International Symbol of Access: The perception of disability. University of Washington Bothell.
Vice, J., Barstow, B.A., Bowman, S., Mehta, T., Padalabalanarayanan, S. (2020): Effectiveness of the International Symbol of Access and inclusivity of other disability groups. Disability and Health Journal, Volume 13, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100836.
See also
Entrance, Exit, Toilets, Elevator
Updated 2024-10-30 by Ch.Brugger