Synonyms / Other Terms Used
Man, Men, Gentlemen
Category
General Information
Message / Function
For notice in general and to indicate facilities limited to males
Source | Description | |
---|---|---|
1) | IATA | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart |
D/FW | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
SADC | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
Dreyfuss | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
BS 8501:2002 | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
ISO 7001 | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
SSRS | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Eco-Mo Foundation |
Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Picto'grafics | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart | |
ADCA | Frontal view of standing male human figure: round shoulders, no arms, legs apart |
|
BAA | Frontal view of standing male human figure: body as rectangle, no arms, legs apart |
|
ICAO | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
LVA | Frontal view of standing male human figure, legs apart, body and arms form an M | |
KFAI | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Erco | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Wiener Linien | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
2) | Port | Frontal view of standing male human figure |
TAC | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Toshiba | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
AIGA | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
ÖNORM A 3011 | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Bolivia | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
D'source | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Expo '70 | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as two rectangles |
|
3) | WO'72 | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as single rectangle |
DTM Berlin | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as two rectangles |
|
Nova Scotia | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as two rectangles |
|
EJP | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as two rectangles |
|
Arntz | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
OS Berlin | Frontal view of standing male human figure, shoulders emphasized | |
Skopec | Frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Skopec | Frontal view of standing male human figure wearing kurta | |
D'source | Frontal view of standing male human figure wearing dhoti | |
Skopec | Frontal view of standing male human figure wearing a long robe | |
UNIT Design | Frontal view of standing male human figure wearing a long robe | |
Dreyfuss | Frontal view of standing male human figure, arms as separate vertical lines | |
exdez | Frontal view of standing male human figure in outline | |
Signbox | Frontal view of standing male human figure: arms not shown |
|
Integral | Contour of frontal view of standing male human figure | |
Handbuch wien.gv.at | Frontal view of standing male human figure in outline, legs as single conic shape | |
Pannicke & Eschenbach |
Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as single conic shape |
|
O'64 | Frontal view of standing male human figure: no arms, legs as single conic shape |
|
Sekta | Frontal view of standing male human figure, asymmetric torso in outline, legs as single conic shape | |
Smitshuijzen | Garment with short sleeves and belt, ellipsis above indicating head | |
ULB | Circle and rectangles indicating frontal view of standing male human figure | |
4) | TA | Frontal view of standing male human figure: body: parabolic conic section, no arms, legs: single rectangle |
Nova Scotia | Side view of standing human figure, one leg ahead of the other | |
D'source | Frontal view of upper part of standing male human figure | |
Erco | Frontal view of upper part of male human figure in sports dress | |
Epidauros | Frontal view of upper part of human figure with scarf and pocket square | |
Anesckha | Frontal view of upper part of male human figure with tie | |
CHBA | Frontal view of male face, hair parted on the side, in outline | |
Unknown | Side view of head in outline | |
Expo 98 | Circle with two dots (eyes), two connected triangles indicating bow tie below | |
Mt. Davis Youth Hostel |
Square and triangle with rounded corners, triangle pointing downwards below | |
Unknown | Stick figure with arms spread horizontally and legs apart | |
Dreyfuss | Vertical line, V superimposed | |
Bliss | Triangle without base line, pointing upwards ending in vertical line | |
Rosenbaum | Letters: Y with ° above | |
Biology | Circle, arrow pointing upwards to the right |
Note: Pictograms or images of Man, Walking are not part of this collection.
Discussion
The collection shown above is only a small selection of the wide variety of graphic symbols used all over the world for messages related to the referent Man or to indicate facilities limited to Males. Some show local characteristics or signs of their times therefore limiting application. Besides the variants shown above a lot more versions exist for toilet signage, sometimes with a focus on posture related to urinating, many also with an intended humorous component, often also difficult to interpret if not presented in combination with the corresponding symbol for Female, and therefore completely inappropriate for general application.
Most studies and discussions regarding this topic are focusing on toilet symbols (e.g. have a look at a blog post with lots of examples and comments by Marissa: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/09/02/guest-post-go-where-sex-gender-and-toilets/), so there is only limited data available considering a more general use:
Gehringer (1979) used the Production Method to explore which mental images or visual stereotypes exist concerning the message Man. The results are more diverse than the selection shown above, with one image content dominating: a male human figure was drawn by 55 % of the respondents. The other images were renderings of the head of a man (14 %) and the symbol from biology (7 %). 15 % of the respondents produced other solutions like a men's hat, pants, a walking stick, or even a pipe, and 9 % did not offer any image.
Basically many rendering showing a male human figure probably are identified as such rather well: in a Japanese study the pictogram variant labeled as Eco-Mo Foundation for example seems to be comprehensible with a comprehension score of 76.6 (Eco-Mo Foundation, 2001). Mackett-Stout & Dewar (1981) combined a number of measures to identify the relative effectiveness of a set of variants. In the evaluation of the four variants marked with 1) to 4), the variant of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) reached the highest efficieny index, and all variants tested except the old Tokyo Airport (TA) variant reached acceptable comprehension rates among the university students volunteering as respondents. The numbering used reflects the rank order of the efficieny index calculated in this study.
But there are more aspects to regard, some of which we already mentioned in our discussion regarding the referent Toilet. In the end excellent comprehensibility, clear discriminablity from related messages, as well as sufficient legibility also for persons with impaired vision has to be a main concern.
One additional aspect maybe sometimes not regarded is mentioned in the symbol design recommendations of the symbol sign study (AIGA, 1993, page 49): 'Research has disclosed that figures with legs separated ... are inviting targets for graffiti artists, especially when the background color is light'.Tests of pictograms of referent Male
Eco-Mo Foundation (2001): Test data of public information symbols in Japan - Procedure for the testing of public information symbols by the Study Committee. ISO: ISO/TC 145/SC 1 N 329.
Gehringer, J. (1979): Untersuchung über die zeichnerische Gestaltung von Pictogrammen in Abhängigkeit von einigen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen, sowie Überprüfung einiger Bildzeichen auf ihre Erkennbarkeit. Dissertation, Psychology Department, University of Vienna.
Tests of pictograms of referent Toilet: Male
Easterby, R.S. & Graydon, I.R. (1981 a): Evaluation of Public Information Symbols: ISO Test: 1979/80 Series. Part I: Appropriateness Ranking Tests. AP Report 99, Applied Psychology Department, University of Aston in Birmingham, January 1981.
Easterby, R.S. & Graydon, I.R. (1981 b): Evaluation of Public Information Symbols: ISO 1979/80 Test Series. Part II: Comprehension/Recognition Tests. AP Report 100, Applied Psychology Department, University of Aston in Birmingham, January 1981.
Mackett-Stout, J. & Dewar, R.L. (1981): Evaluation of Public Information Signs. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 139-151.
See also
Female, Toilet, Barber Shop, Hairdresser
Updated 2024-10-06 by Ch.Brugger