Synonyms / Other Terms Used
Autobus, Coach, Shuttle, Shuttle Bus, City Bus, Bus Transportation, Buses, Tourist Buses, Bus Terminal, Bus Station, Bus Stop
Category
Transportation, Transport Facilities, Transport Modes, Travel, Public Facilities, Tourism
Message / Function
To indicate transport by bus or the location of buses
Source | Description | |
---|---|---|
* | WO'72 | Side view of bus |
TA | Side view of bus | |
ISO 7001 | Side view of symmetric bus | |
Ecuador | Side view of bus | |
ÖBB | Side view of bus | |
UIC 413 | Side view of bus | |
Bolivia | Side view of bus | |
Peru 2016 | Side view of six-wheel bus | |
Schiphol | Side view of bus | |
Transantiago | Side view of bus with stripe | |
France IISR | Side view of bus | |
STVO D | Side view of bus | |
PMP RI | Side view of bus | |
Expo 67 | Side view of bus | |
NS 1980 | Side view of bus | |
Eco-Mo Foundation |
Side view of bus showing front door | |
* | ATA | Side view of bus with large front door |
ADCA | Side view of bus with additional windows in front area | |
Québec | Side view of bus with three axes plus several details | |
SVI | Side view of symmetric bus with doors in front, middle and back | |
ICAO | Side view of bus with many details | |
TA | Side view of detailed bus | |
Québec | Side view of bus with several details | |
Transport for London |
Side view of detailed bus | |
* | TC | Side view of bus on surface shown as line |
McLaren & Braunstein | Side view of bus with several details on surface shown as filled rectangle | |
Québec | Side view of bus with several details | |
Québec | Side view of bus with several details | |
* | LVA | Side view of bus with several details in outline |
O'68 | Side view of front part of bus inside circle | |
SWISSTRAFFIC | Side view of front part of bus | |
ETH Zurich | Side view of front part of bus | |
Handbuch wien.gv.at | Detailed side view of front part of bus in outline | |
Erco | Front view of bus plus text BUS | |
OCHA | Detailed front view of bus | |
MUTCD | Detailed front view of bus | |
SADC | Detailed front view of bus | |
D'source | Detailed front view of bus | |
Picto'grafics | Front view of bus | |
Avanti PUM | Front view of bus | |
Galicia | Front view of bus | |
AIGA | Front view of bus | |
Aragón | Front view of bus | |
EJP | Front view of bus | |
Slovenia 2015 | Front view of bus | |
Museu Blau | Front view of bus in outline | |
Wahyuntitle | Detailed front view of bus | |
ONCE | Detailed front view of bus with driver and text BUS | |
Handbuch wien.gv.at | Front view of bus in outline | |
Network Rail | Front view of double-decker bus | |
SSRS | Front view of bus, bus stop sign indicated left of the bus | |
GSR Portugal | Front view of bus, platform and roof details on the right | |
Québec | Covered platform with human figure walking towards front view of bus | |
González | Human figures next to clipped frontal view of bus |
Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.
Discussion
The examples above are only a small selection from the multitude of bus images that can be found as public information symbols in guiding systems worldwide. While variants of a bus presented in side view usually can be identified clearly, buses in front view may be mixed up with other vehicles more easily.
A number of studies present research covering several pictogram variants for this referent. These papers offer some important information:
Using the Production Method Gehringer (1979) explored which mental images or visual stereotypes exist concerning the message Bus. 83 % of the responses showed a bus in side view. In about 12 % variants showing a bus with a bus stop sign were presented. Another 3 % provided other solutions and 2 % did not produce any result. Responses indicate that there exists a visual stereotype regarding Bus. This observation corresponds to the selection of pictograms found, which is dominated by images showing a bus in side view.
Kristina Skone from the University of Vienna (1977) tested bus symbols with varying level of detail. The minimalist bus of ISO 7001 in the table above was a result of that study, showing two relevant attributes required for well designed pictograms: it is not directional and it can be identified well in small scale reproduction.
Mackett-Stout & Dewar (1981) combined a number of measures to identify the relative effectiveness of a set of variants. In the evaluation of the four variants marked with a *, the variant from the Winter Olympic Games in Sapporo 1972 (WO'72) reached the highest efficieny index, and all variants tested except the LVA variant reached excellent comprehension rates among the university students volunteering as respondents.
In a Matching Test with a set of 29 symbols (Zwaga & Boersema, 1983) the variant from the Dutch Railways (NS 1980, Nederlandse Spoorwegen) reached 62 % correct responses. Symmetrical confusions with the referent Tram happened quite frequently.
Two later studies confirm that side views of buses are superior to front views concerning comprehensibility: in a Japanese study to propose domestically unified graphical symbols based on scientific methods, the pictogram variant labeled as Eco-Mo Foundation showing a bus in side view proved to be highly comprehensible with a comprehension score of 97.4 (Eco-Mo Foundation, 2001), while for a map symbol based on a front view of a bus similar to the AIGA symbol only 69.3 % of the responses could be classified as correct when examined by Fiori (2008).
Recommendation
Based on data known, we recommend the use of a pictogram PI TF 006 of ISO 7001 as it is unambiguous, not directional and suitable for small scale reproduction. Adding further details will not improve performance.
Tests of pictograms of referent Bus
Eco-Mo Foundation (2001): Test data of public information symbols in Japan - Procedure for the testing of public information symbols by the Study Committee. ISO: ISO/TC 145/SC 1 N 329.
Fiori, S. R. (2008): Mapas para o turismo e a interatividade - proposta teórica e prática. Tese de Doutorado - Depto. de Geografia, FFLCH-USP.
Gehringer, J. (1979): Untersuchung über die zeichnerische Gestaltung von Pictogrammen in Abhängigkeit von einigen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen, sowie Überprüfung einiger Bildzeichen auf ihre Erkennbarkeit. Dissertation, Psychology Department, University of Vienna.
Mackett-Stout, J. & Dewar, R.L. (1981): Evaluation of Public Information Signs. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 139-151.
Skone, K. (1977): Erkennbarkeit von Symbolvarianten. Dissertation, Psychology Department, University of Vienna.
Zwaga, H.J. & Boersema, T. (1983): Evaluation of a set of graphic symbols. Applied Ergonomics, 14, 1, 43-54.
See also
Railway, Subway, Tram, Funicular
Car, Taxi
Park & Ride, Parking, Parking Garage
Updated 2024-11-06 by Ch.Brugger